Research
Epitranscriptomics & Cancer Adaptation : A.David

Activities

Our research work focuses on the contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms on cancer cell adaptation, in particular RNA epigenetic & translational control.

More..

Zotero public

Added by amaraver
Group name EquipeAM
Item Type Journal Article
Title Randomized phase 3 study of the anti-disialoganglioside antibody dinutuximab and irinotecan vs irinotecan or topotecan for second-line treatment of small cell lung cancer
Creator Edelman et al.
Author Martin J. Edelman
Author Mikhail Dvorkin
Author Konstatin Laktionov
Author Alejandro Navarro
Author Oscar Juan-Vidal
Author Vadim Kozlov
Author Gil Golden
Author Odette Jordan
Author C. Q. Deng
Author Dmitriy Bentsion
Author Christos Chouaid
Author Hristo Dechev
Author Afshin Dowlati
Author Natalia Fernández Núñez
Author Olexandr Ivashchuk
Author Ivane Kiladze
Author Tsira Kortua
Author Natasha Leighl
Author Aleksandr Luft
Author Tamta Makharadze
Author YoungJoo Min
Author Xavier Quantin
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Topotecan is approved as second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Irinotecan is also frequently used given its more convenient schedule and superior tolerability. Preclinical studies support disialoganglioside (GD2) as an SCLC target and the combination of dinutuximab, an anti-GD2 antibody, plus irinotecan in this setting. We tested dinutuximab/irinotecan versus irinotecan or topotecan as second-line therapy in relapsed/refractory (RR) SCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with RR SCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 were randomized 2:2:1 to receive dinutuximab 16-17.5 mg/m2 intravenous (IV)/irinotecan 350 mg/m2 IV (day 1), irinotecan 350 mg/m2 IV (day 1), or topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 IV (days 1-5) in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), and clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + stable disease). Safety/tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 471 patients were randomized to dinutuximab/irinotecan (n = 187), irinotecan (n = 190), or topotecan (n = 94). Age, sex, performance status, prior therapies, and metastatic disease sites were similar between groups. Survival and response rates were not improved for patients receiving dinutuximab/irinotecan versus those receiving irinotecan or topotecan (median OS 6.9 vs 7.0 vs 7.4 months [p = 0.3132]; median PFS 3.5 vs 3.0 vs 3.4 months [p = 0.3482]; ORR confirmed 17.1% vs 18.9% vs 20.2% [p = 0.8043]; and CBR 67.4% vs 58.9% vs 68.1% [p = 0.0989]), respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events (?5% receiving dinutuximab/irinotecan) included neutropenia, anemia, diarrhea, and asthenia. CONCLUSIONS: Dinutuximab/irinotecan treatment did not result in improved OS in RR SCLC versus irinotecan alone. Irinotecan administered every 21 days demonstrated comparable activity to topotecan administered daily × 5 every 21 days. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier. NCT03098030.
Publication Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Volume 166
Pages 135-142
Date 2022-04
Journal Abbr Lung Cancer
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.03.003
ISSN 1872-8332
Library Catalog PubMed
Extra PMID: 35278766
Tags Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, clinic, Dinutuximab, Disialoganglioside, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Second-line treatment, Small cell, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Topotecan
Date Added 2022/08/31 - 14:13:38
Date Modified 2022/08/31 - 14:13:51
Notes and Attachments PubMed entry (Attachment)


© Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier - 2011 - Tous droits réservés - Mentions légales - Connexion - Conception : ID Alizés