Added by |
standudu |
Last modified by |
amaraver |
Group name |
EquipeAM |
Item Type |
Journal Article |
Title |
A Randomized Non-Comparative Phase II Study of Anti-Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Atezolizumab or Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results From the IFCT-1603 Trial |
Creator |
Pujol et al. |
Author |
Jean-Louis Pujol |
Author |
Laurent Greillier |
Author |
Clarisse Audigier-Valette |
Author |
Denis Moro-Sibilot |
Author |
Lionel Uwer |
Author |
José Hureaux |
Author |
Florian Guisier |
Author |
Delphine Carmier |
Author |
Jeannick Madelaine |
Author |
Josiane Otto |
Author |
Valérie Gounant |
Author |
Patrick Merle |
Author |
Pierre Mourlanette |
Author |
Olivier Molinier |
Author |
Aldo Renault |
Author |
Audrey Rabeau |
Author |
Martine Antoine |
Author |
Marc G. Denis |
Author |
Alexandra Langlais |
Author |
Franck Morin |
Author |
Pierre-Jean Souquet |
Abstract |
INTRODUCTION: This randomized phase II trial aimed at evaluating the engineered programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody atezolizumab in SCLC progressing after first-line platinum-etoposide chemotherapy.
METHODS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to atezolizumab (1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or conventional chemotherapy (up to 6 cycles of topotecan or re-induction of initial chemotherapy). Patients were not selected based on PD-L1 tissue expression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at 6 weeks. A two-stage design with 2:1 randomization and O'Brien-Fleming stopping rules was used. The null hypothesis was rejected if more than 12 of 45 patients were responders.
RESULTS: Overall, 73 patients were randomized (atezolizumab n = 49; chemotherapy n = 24). At 6 weeks, 1 of 43 eligible atezolizumab patients achieved an objective response (2.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-6.8), whereas 8 others had stable disease (20.9% disease control rate; 95% CI: 8.8-33.1). Among eligible chemotherapy patients (n = 20), 10% achieved an objective response (65% disease control rate). Median progression-free survival was 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.2-1.5) with atezolizumab and 4.3 months (95% CI: 1.5-5.9) with chemotherapy. Overall survival did not significantly differ between groups. Median overall survival was 9.5 months versus 8.7 months for the atezolizumab and the chemotherapy group, respectively (adjusted hazard ratioatezolizumab : 0.84, 95% CI: 0.45-1.58; p = 0.60). Two atezolizumab patients (4.2%) experienced grade 3 fatigue, and two others grade 1 dysthyroidism. Among 53 evaluable specimens, only 1 (2%) had positive immunohistochemical PD-L1 staining (SP142 clone).
CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab monotherapy in relapsed SCLC failed to show significant efficacy. No unexpected safety concerns were observed. |
Publication |
Journal of Thoracic Oncology: Official Publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer |
Volume |
14 |
Issue |
5 |
Pages |
903-913 |
Date |
May 2019 |
Journal Abbr |
J Thorac Oncol |
Language |
eng |
DOI |
10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.008 |
ISSN |
1556-1380 |
Short Title |
A Randomized Non-Comparative Phase II Study of Anti-Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Atezolizumab or Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer |
Library Catalog |
PubMed |
Extra |
PMID: 30664989 |
Tags |
Atezolizumab, Chemotherapy, clinic, Programmed cell death ligand 1, SCLC |
Date Added |
2019/05/16 - 11:44:18 |
Date Modified |
2020/01/20 - 11:49:50 |
Notes and Attachments |
PubMed entry (Attachment) |