Research
Epitranscriptomics & Cancer Adaptation : A.David

Activities

Our research work focuses on the contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms on cancer cell adaptation, in particular RNA epigenetic & translational control.

More..

Zotero public

Added by JPPOUGET
Group name EquipeJPP
Item Type Journal Article
Title Cross-Calibration Study of The Stratos And Hologic QDR 4500A Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers to Assess Bone Mineral Density And Body Composition
Creator Maïmoun et al.
Author Laurent Maïmoun
Author Sandrine Alonso
Author Krishna Kunal Mahadea
Author Vincent Boudousq
Author Thibault Mura
Author Denis Mariano-Goulart
Abstract The objective of the study was to assess the agreement between the Stratos (DMS) and QDR 4500A (Hologic) DXAs in determining whole body and regional aBMD, as well as whole body composition. Fifty-five individuals (46 women: 84%) with a mean age of 41 ± 13.0 years (range: 20 to 64) and a mean BMI of 31.9 ± 10 kg/m² (range: 12.2 to 49.5) were consecutively scanned on the same day using the two devices. Predictive equations for areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and whole body composition (WBC) were derived from linear regression of the data. The two DXAs were highly correlated (p<0.001 for all parameters) with a correlation coefficient (r) ranging from 0.89 to 0.99 for aBMD (r=0.89 for whole body, r=0.92 for radius, r=0.95 for femoral neck, r=0.96 for total hip, and r=0.99 for L1-L4). For WBC, the r value was 0.98 for lean tissue mass (LTM) and 1.0 for fat mass (FM). Paired t-tests indicated a statistically significant bias between the two DXAs for the majority of measurements, requiring the determination of specific cross-calibration equations. Compared to QDR 4500A, Stratos underestimated whole body aBMD and LTM and overestimated neck and hip aBMD and whole body FM. Conversely, no significant bias was demonstrated for mean aBMD at L1-L4 and radius. For whole body aBMD and FM, the concordance between the two DXAs was influenced by BMI. Despite a high concordance between the two DXAs, the systematic bias for aBMD and WBC measurements illustrates the need to define cross-calibration equations to compare data across systems.
Publication Journal of Clinical Densitometry: The Official Journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
Volume 26
Issue 4
Pages 101434
Date 2023-10-28
Journal Abbr J Clin Densitom
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101434
ISSN 1094-6950
Library Catalog PubMed
Extra Number: 4 PMID: 37948835
Tags Absorptiometry, Photon, Adult, Areal bone mineral density (aBMD), Body Composition, Bone Density, Calibration, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, original, QDR 4500A, Scientific, Stratos, X-Rays
Date Added 2023/11/23 - 12:44:36
Date Modified 2024/12/15 - 12:11:48
Notes and Attachments PubMed entry (Attachment)
Submitted Version (Attachment)


© Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier - 2011 - Tous droits réservés - Mentions légales - Connexion - Conception : ID Alizés