Research
Epitranscriptomics & Cancer Adaptation : A.David

Activities

Our research work focuses on the contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms on cancer cell adaptation, in particular RNA epigenetic & translational control.

More..

Zotero public

Added by mollevi
Group name EquipeMY
Item Type Journal Article
Title Prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a French intergroup (Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive, Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, and Groupe Cooperateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) study
Creator Guimbaud et al.
Author R. Guimbaud
Author C. Louvet
Author P. Ries
Author M. Ychou
Author E. Maillard
Author T. Andre
Author J. M. Gornet
Author T. Aparicio
Author S. Nguyen
Author A. Azzedine
Author P. L. Etienne
Author E. Boucher
Author C. Rebischung
Author P. Hammel
Author P. Rougier
Author L. Bedenne
Author O. Bouche
Abstract PURPOSE: To compare epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatments in patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open, randomized, phase III study was carried out in 71 centers. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric or EGJ cancer were randomly assigned to receive either ECX as first-line treatment (ECX arm) or FOLFIRI (FOLFIRI arm). Second-line treatment was predefined (FOLFIRI for the ECX arm and ECX for the FOLFIRI arm). The primary criterion was time-to-treatment failure (TTF) of the first-line therapy. Secondary criteria were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS: In all, 416 patients were included (median age, 61.4 years; 74% male). After a median follow-up of 31 months, median TTF was significantly longer with FOLFIRI than with ECX (5.1 v 4.2 months; P = .008). There was no significant difference between the two groups in median PFS (5.3 v 5.8 months; P = .96), median OS (9.5 v 9.7 months; P = .95), or response rate (39.2% v 37.8%). First-line FOLFIRI was better tolerated (overall rate of grade 3 to 4 toxicity, 69% v 84%; P < .001; hematologic adverse events [AEs], 38% v 64.5%; P < .001; nonhematologic AEs: 53% v 53.5%; P = .81). CONCLUSION: FOLFIRI as first-line treatment for advanced gastric and EGJ cancer demonstrated significantly better TTF than did ECX. Other outcome results indicate that FOLFIRI is an acceptable first-line regimen in this setting and should be explored as a backbone regimen for targeted agents.
Publication J Clin Oncol
Volume 32
Pages 3520-6
Date Nov 1 2014
Journal Abbr Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
DOI 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.1011
ISSN 1527-7755 (Electronic) 0732-183X (Linking)
Tags Adenocarcinoma/*drug therapy/*pathology, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration &, Camptothecin/administration & dosage/analogs & derivatives, Cisplatin/administration & dosage, clinic, Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage/analogs & derivatives, dosage/*therapeutic use, Epirubicin/administration & dosage, Esophagogastric Junction/*pathology, Female, Fluorouracil/administration & dosage/analogs & derivatives, Follow-Up Studies, France, Humans, Leucovorin/administration & dosage, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Stomach Neoplasms/*drug therapy/*pathology, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome
Date Added 2019/05/22 - 09:42:41
Date Modified 2019/05/22 - 09:43:53
Notes and Attachments (Note)
(Note)
25287828 (Attachment)


© Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier - 2011 - Tous droits réservés - Mentions légales - Connexion - Conception : ID Alizés