Research
Epitranscriptomics & Cancer Adaptation : A.David

Activities

Our research work focuses on the contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms on cancer cell adaptation, in particular RNA epigenetic & translational control.

More..

Zotero public

Added by mollevi
Group name EquipeMY
Item Type Journal Article
Title Differentiation of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma from Atypical Leiomyoma: Diagnostic Accuracy of Qualitative MR Imaging Features and Feasibility of Texture Analysis
Creator Lakhman et al.
Author Yulia Lakhman
Author Harini Veeraraghavan
Author Joshua Chaim
Author Diana Feier
Author Debra A. Goldman
Author Chaya S. Moskowitz
Author Stephanie Nougaret
Author Ramon E. Sosa
Author Hebert Alberto Vargas
Author Robert A. Soslow
Author Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum
Author Hedvig Hricak
Author Evis Sala
Abstract PURPOSE: To investigate whether qualitative magnetic resonance (MR) features can distinguish leiomyosarcoma (LMS) from atypical leiomyoma (ALM) and assess the feasibility of texture analysis (TA). METHODS: This retrospective study included 41 women (ALM?=?22, LMS?=?19) imaged with MRI prior to surgery. Two readers (R1, R2) evaluated each lesion for qualitative MR features. Associations between MR features and LMS were evaluated with Fisher's exact test. Accuracy measures were calculated for the four most significant features. TA was performed for 24 patients (ALM?=?14, LMS?=?10) with uniform imaging following lesion segmentation on axial T2-weighted images. Texture features were pre-selected using Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction and analyzed with unsupervised clustering to separate LMS from ALM. RESULTS: Four qualitative MR features most strongly associated with LMS were nodular borders, haemorrhage, "T2 dark" area(s), and central unenhanced area(s) (p???0.0001 each feature/reader). The highest sensitivity [1.00 (95%CI:0.82-1.00)/0.95 (95%CI: 0.74-1.00)] and specificity [0.95 (95%CI:0.77-1.00)/1.00 (95%CI:0.85-1.00)] were achieved for R1/R2, respectively, when a lesion had ?3 of these four features. Sixteen texture features differed significantly between LMS and ALM (p-values: <0.001-0.036). Unsupervised clustering achieved accuracy of 0.75 (sensitivity: 0.70; specificity: 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of ?3 qualitative MR features accurately distinguished LMS from ALM. TA was feasible. KEY POINTS: ? Four qualitative MR features demonstrated the strongest statistical association with LMS. ? Combination of ?3 these features could accurately differentiate LMS from ALM. ? Texture analysis was a feasible semi-automated approach for lesion categorization.
Publication European Radiology
Volume 27
Issue 7
Pages 2903-2915
Date Jul 2017
Journal Abbr Eur Radiol
Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s00330-016-4623-9
ISSN 1432-1084
Short Title Differentiation of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma from Atypical Leiomyoma
Library Catalog PubMed
Extra PMID: 27921159 PMCID: PMC5459669
Tags Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atypical Uterine Leiomyoma, clinic, Diagnosis, Differential, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Leiomyoma, Leiomyosarcoma, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Texture Analysis, Uterine Leiomyoma, Uterine Leiomyosarcoma, Uterine Neoplasms, Young Adult
Date Added 2018/11/13 - 17:35:29
Date Modified 2019/05/21 - 13:34:17


© Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier - 2011 - Tous droits réservés - Mentions légales - Connexion - Conception : ID Alizés