Research
Epitranscriptomics & Cancer Adaptation : A.David

Activities

Our research work focuses on the contribution of post-transcriptional mechanisms on cancer cell adaptation, in particular RNA epigenetic & translational control.

More..

Zotero public

Added by adjiane.lab
Group name EquipeAD
Item Type Journal Article
Title Artificial nutrition in patients with cancer has no impact on tumour glucose metabolism: Results of the PETANC Study
Creator Deshayes et al.
Author Emmanuel Deshayes
Author Hélène de Forges
Author Julien Fraisse
Author Marie-Claude Eberlé
Author Sophie Guillemard
Author Anne Fallières
Author Jean-Pierre Pouget
Author Pierre-Olivier Kotzki
Author Lore Santoro
Author Pierre Senesse
Author Nicolas Flori
Abstract BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nutrition support is recommended in cachexic patients with cancer. However, there is no clear evidence about its impact on tumour growth. Glycolysis, which is usually higher in cancer than normal cells, can be monitored by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging that is widely used for cancer staging and therapy efficacy assessment. Here, we used 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging to investigate whether artificial nutrition has an impact on tumour glucose metabolism in patients with cancer and cachexia. METHODS: This prospective study included ten patients with histologically proven head and neck or oesophageal cancer. All patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging at baseline and after (parenteral and/or enteral) nutrition support on average for 7 days. Tumour glucose metabolism changes were evaluated using static (SUVmax, SUVmean and SULpeak) and dynamic (glucose metabolic rate and transport constant rates, k) parameters computed from the 18F-FDG PET/CT data. RESULTS: Artificial nutrition (median energy intake of 21.83 kcal/kg/day [13.16-45.90], protein intake of 0.84 g/kg/day [0.56-1.64]) was administered. Eight patients (80%) received enteral nutrition and two patients (20%) parenteral support. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters did not highlight any significant difference in tumour glucose metabolism before and after the period of nutrition support. CONCLUSIONS: In cachexic patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer, nutrition support administered according to the current guidelines shows no impact on tumour glucose metabolism, assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Publication Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Volume 38
Issue 5
Pages 2121-2126
Date Oct 2019
Journal Abbr Clin Nutr
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.033
ISSN 1532-1983
Short Title Artificial nutrition in patients with cancer has no impact on tumour glucose metabolism
Library Catalog PubMed
Extra 00000 PMID: 30209026
Tags (18)F-FDG PET/CT, Cachexia, clinic, Nutritional support, Supportive care, Tumour growth
Date Added 2019/10/24 - 15:07:01
Date Modified 2024/09/30 - 01:35:45
Notes and Attachments PubMed entry (Attachment)


© Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier - 2011 - Tous droits réservés - Mentions légales - Connexion - Conception : ID Alizés